Blog/News
When most people think about the effects of a criminal conviction, they focus on the immediate penalties: fines, probation, or incarceration. However, what many fail to consider are the collateral consequences—those indirect but serious ramifications that can follow a person long after their sentence is served. These consequences can affect nearly every aspect of life, from employment to housing to civil rights.
Employment Challenges
One of the most significant collateral consequences of a criminal conviction is its impact on employment. Many employers conduct background checks, and a conviction—even for a minor offense—can make it difficult to secure a job. Certain professions, particularly those requiring professional licenses (such as law, medicine, or finance), may be entirely closed off to individuals with a criminal record.
Housing Barriers
Finding stable housing can also be a challenge for individuals with criminal convictions. Many landlords conduct background checks and may deny rental applications based on an applicant’s criminal record. Public housing authorities have strict regulations that can disqualify individuals with certain convictions, making it even harder for them to secure a place to live.
Loss of Civil Rights
A criminal conviction can lead to the loss of several civil rights, depending on the jurisdiction and the severity of the offense. For example, felony convictions can result in the loss of voting rights, the right to serve on a jury, and the right to possess firearms. While some states allow individuals to restore these rights over time, the process can be lengthy and complex.
Immigration Consequences
For non-citizens, a criminal conviction can have severe immigration consequences, including deportation, denial of re-entry into the United States, or ineligibility for naturalization. Certain offenses, even those considered minor under state law, can trigger mandatory removal proceedings under federal immigration laws.
Family Law Implications
A criminal conviction can also impact family law matters, such as child custody and visitation rights. Courts may consider a parent’s criminal record when determining what is in the best interests of the child, potentially leading to restrictions on custody or supervised visitation arrangements.
Educational Barriers
Many colleges and universities ask about criminal history on applications, and some institutions may deny admission based on a prior conviction. Additionally, individuals with drug-related convictions may be ineligible for federal student financial aid, limiting their ability to pursue higher education.
Professional Licensing and Business Opportunities
A criminal conviction can create obstacles for those seeking professional licenses required for certain careers, such as law, healthcare, or real estate. Additionally, some individuals may face challenges in obtaining business loans or forming partnerships due to their criminal record.
Steps to Mitigate Collateral Consequences
While the collateral consequences of a criminal conviction can be daunting, there are steps individuals can take to mitigate their impact:
-
Expungement or Record Sealing: Some convictions may be eligible for expungement or sealing, which can limit public access to the record.
-
Restoration of Rights: In some cases, individuals can petition for the restoration of civil rights, such as voting or firearm ownership.
-
Employment Assistance Programs: Various organizations help individuals with criminal records find employment opportunities.
-
Legal Assistance: Consulting with an experienced criminal defense attorney can help individuals navigate post-conviction challenges and explore options for relief.
Conclusion
The impact of a criminal conviction extends far beyond the courtroom. Understanding these collateral consequences is crucial for individuals facing charges and for those who have already been convicted. If you or a loved one is dealing with these challenges, seeking legal counsel can help you take proactive steps toward rebuilding your future.
We are committed to helping individuals understand their rights and options. Contact us today for a consultation.
In the realm of criminal justice, two terms often surface when discussing clemency: pardon and commutation. While both involve acts of mercy granted to individuals convicted of crimes, they serve different purposes and have distinct legal and practical implications. This article will clarify the key differences between these two forms of clemency.
What Is a Pardon?
A pardon is an act of forgiveness issued by a government authority, typically a president at the federal level or a governor at the state level. It removes legal penalties associated with a conviction and often restores certain rights lost due to the conviction, such as the right to vote, hold public office, or own firearms.
A pardon does not expunge or erase the criminal record; the conviction remains, but the individual is forgiven for the offense. Pardons are generally granted in recognition of good behavior, remorse, or rehabilitation after the conviction. They are also sometimes used to address wrongful convictions or perceived injustices.
Key Features of a Pardon:
-
Forgives the offense but does not erase the criminal record.
-
Often restores civil rights lost due to the conviction.
-
Requires an application or petition in most cases.
-
Does not necessarily signify innocence.
What Is a Commutation?
A commutation is a reduction of a sentence that has already been imposed. It does not eliminate the conviction or associated penalties entirely but shortens the punishment. For instance, a commutation might reduce a life sentence to a term of years or convert a death sentence to life imprisonment.
Commutations are often granted to individuals who have demonstrated rehabilitation, served a significant portion of their sentence, or are facing extraordinary circumstances, such as a terminal illness. Unlike a pardon, a commutation does not restore civil rights or forgive the offense—it merely modifies the sentence to make it less severe.
Key Features of a Commutation:
-
Reduces the severity of a sentence without nullifying the conviction.
-
Does not restore civil rights.
-
Often granted in cases of hardship, good behavior, or mitigating circumstances.
-
Requires a petition in most cases.
Comparing Pardons and Commutations
| Aspect | Pardon | Commutation |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Forgiveness of the crime and restoration of rights | Reduction of sentence severity |
| Effect on Conviction | Does not erase the conviction | Conviction remains unchanged |
| Restoration of Rights | Often restores civil rights | Does not restore rights |
| Eligibility | Typically post-conviction and post-sentence | Can be granted during imprisonment |
Legal and Social Implications
Pardons and commutations reflect a government’s recognition of mercy and justice. However, they are not without controversy. Critics argue that these powers can be misused for political purposes, while proponents emphasize their role in correcting injustices and showing compassion.
Understanding the difference between these two forms of clemency is crucial for anyone navigating the legal system, advocating for criminal justice reform, or seeking relief for themselves or others. Whether through forgiveness or leniency, both pardons and commutations represent the balance between justice and mercy within the criminal justice system.
In the competitive legal landscape of New Orleans, where the stakes in criminal defense are high and clients expect nothing but the best representation, one name has consistently stood out for nearly a decade: Attorney Stephen Hebert. Once again, Hebert has earned the distinction of being recognized as one of the Three Best Rated criminal defense lawyers in New Orleans, marking his 8th consecutive year receiving this prestigious honor.
A Decade of Excellence
Stephen Hebert's inclusion in Three Best Rated’s list is no coincidence. This platform rigorously evaluates local businesses and professionals, ensuring only the most qualified and top-performing individuals earn a spot. Attorneys are assessed on a 50-point inspection that includes factors such as reputation, history, complaints, ratings, satisfaction, trust, cost, and general excellence.
Hebert’s continued recognition is a testament to his unwavering dedication to his clients and the legal community. With a practice that emphasizes personalized legal strategies, he has successfully defended countless individuals facing serious criminal charges, from misdemeanors to complex felonies.
A Commitment to Justice
Stephen Hebert’s philosophy revolves around a client-first approach. He understands the emotional and legal challenges that come with criminal charges, and he tirelessly advocates for his clients at every stage of the process. His thorough preparation, sharp courtroom skills, and compassionate demeanor set him apart as a leader in the field.
Clients frequently praise Hebert for his clear communication, accessibility, and ability to achieve favorable outcomes even in the most challenging cases. Fellow attorneys and judges respect him for his professionalism, integrity, and deep understanding of criminal law.
About Three Best Rated
Three Best Rated is a consumer-oriented platform dedicated to identifying and celebrating the top three businesses and professionals in various industries within a given city. Its meticulous evaluation process ensures that only the best earn the title. For Stephen Hebert, being ranked among the top three for eight consecutive years highlights not only his consistent excellence but also his enduring impact on the New Orleans community.
Looking Ahead
As Stephen Hebert celebrates this milestone, he remains committed to delivering top-tier legal representation. His dedication to defending the rights and freedoms of his clients continues to be a driving force behind his success.
For those in need of a trusted criminal defense attorney in New Orleans, Stephen Hebert’s name has become synonymous with excellence, reliability, and justice. His consistent recognition by Three Best Rated underscores his status as a pillar of the legal community and a champion for his clients.
Final Thoughts
Being recognized as one of the Three Best Rated criminal defense lawyers for the 8th consecutive year is a remarkable achievement that speaks volumes about Stephen Hebert’s expertise and dedication. As he continues to set the bar high for legal excellence in New Orleans, clients and peers alike can look forward to his continued contributions to the field of criminal defense.
Interacting with law enforcement can be a daunting and intimidating experience, especially if you are unaware of your rights. Whether you’re approached as a witness, a suspect, or even as a victim of a crime, one principle remains crucial: never speak to law enforcement without a lawyer present. This isn’t about being uncooperative or evasive; it’s about protecting your rights and ensuring that any statements you make cannot be misconstrued or used against you. Here’s why this advice is essential:
1. The Right to Remain Silent Is Your Shield
The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees your right against self-incrimination. This means you are not required to say anything that might implicate you in a crime, even unintentionally. However, simply invoking your right to remain silent isn’t always enough. A lawyer can guide you on what to say—or not say—ensuring your silence isn’t misinterpreted as guilt.
2. Misstatements Can Have Severe Consequences
Even innocent individuals may inadvertently say something that law enforcement can use against them. The stress of being questioned, the complexity of the law, and the pressure to "cooperate" can lead to seemingly harmless errors. A misstatement, inconsistency, or poorly worded answer can raise suspicion, even when there’s no wrongdoing.
For example, if you provide a timeline of your actions and later realize you got a detail wrong, that inconsistency might be seen as a lie, undermining your credibility.
3. Law Enforcement’s Goals May Not Align With Yours
While most police officers act in good faith, their primary objective is to solve crimes and gather evidence. This can sometimes lead them to view you as a potential suspect, even if you approached them voluntarily. Anything you say can be recorded, documented, and potentially used as evidence—whether or not it’s relevant or accurate.
Additionally, officers are trained in interrogation techniques designed to elicit confessions or statements. Without a lawyer to level the playing field, you may inadvertently fall into traps, even if you’re entirely innocent.
4. You May Not Know the Full Context
When law enforcement questions you, they may already have information you don’t. Your answers could unintentionally confirm or contradict their existing evidence. Without understanding the full scope of their investigation, you risk walking into a situation unprepared. A lawyer, however, can gather necessary information and advise you on how to proceed safely.
5. Your Lawyer Ensures Fair Treatment
Having a lawyer present ensures your rights are respected during any interaction with law enforcement. A lawyer can:
- Prevent inappropriate or leading questions.
- Stop questioning if it becomes coercive or violates your rights.
- Advise you on whether to answer specific questions or invoke your right to silence.
- Protect you from agreeing to anything that could harm your case or reputation.
How to Politely Refuse to Speak Without a Lawyer
It’s important to assert your rights respectfully and calmly. If approached by law enforcement, you can say something like:
- “I would like to speak to my lawyer before answering any questions.”
- “I am invoking my right to remain silent and request my attorney.”
This response is not an admission of guilt; it’s a clear, lawful assertion of your rights.
Final Thoughts
Remaining silent and requesting legal counsel is not about obstructing justice; it’s about protecting yourself from potential misunderstandings and ensuring fair treatment. By having a lawyer present, you level the playing field and safeguard your rights. Remember: it’s not about what you say—it’s how what you say can be used.
No matter how confident or innocent you feel, never assume you can navigate an interaction with law enforcement on your own. Trust your lawyer to guide you through the process and ensure your best interests are protected.
In an impressive professional milestone, criminal defense attorney Stephen Hébert has been named one of New Orleans Magazine's "Top Lawyers" in the field of criminal defense for the ninth time. This recognition not only highlights Hébert's expertise and dedication but also underscores his consistent reputation as one of the city’s leading legal advocates in criminal law.
Hébert has built a distinguished career as a criminal defense attorney, earning a reputation for his skillful defense and dedication to clients' rights. Over the years, he has successfully represented numerous clients in a variety of complex criminal cases, from misdemeanors to serious felony charges. His approach to each case is characterized by meticulous preparation, thorough investigation, and unwavering commitment to achieving the best possible outcomes for his clients. This accolade is a testament to Hébert's continued excellence in a challenging and evolving area of law.
Each year, New Orleans Magazine partners with a national research organization, often utilizing peer-reviewed surveys to compile a list of the area’s top attorneys across various fields of law. Here’s a look at how the selection process typically works:
-
Peer Nomination: The process starts with peer nominations, where licensed attorneys in the region nominate colleagues they believe exemplify professional excellence in their respective fields. These nominations reflect the trust and respect of fellow attorneys, a crucial component in identifying leaders within each practice area.
-
Evaluation and Research: Following the initial nominations, nominees undergo an evaluation by a research team. This involves reviewing their experience, case outcomes, client satisfaction, and adherence to professional standards. The research team considers various metrics, ensuring that each selected lawyer has made a significant impact within their field and maintains a positive reputation among peers and clients alike.
-
Final Selection: Once the evaluations are complete, the magazine publishes its final list, honoring attorneys who have demonstrated excellence in their practice areas. The list includes attorneys across multiple specialties, with criminal defense being one of the most competitive categories.
Being named to this list is a distinguished accomplishment for any attorney. However, achieving this honor for nine years highlights Hébert’s consistency and continued leadership in criminal defense. Such repeated recognition suggests a deep trust within the legal community and reinforces his reputation for outstanding advocacy and professionalism.
Beyond his legal victories, Hébert’s dedication to his clients and the broader community further sets him apart. In addition to his work in the courtroom, he has made substantial contributions to legal education and public service, striving to make a positive impact on the legal landscape in New Orleans.
Stephen Hébert's inclusion among New Orleans Magazine's Top Lawyers for the ninth year in criminal defense is a well-deserved recognition of his exceptional skills, dedication to justice, and the trust he has earned from peers and clients alike. As he continues his practice, Hébert remains a crucial asset to the New Orleans legal community, embodying the highest standards of his profession.
A "no contest" plea, also known as a "nolo contendere" plea, under Louisiana law, allows a defendant to accept conviction without admitting guilt. It has the same legal effect as a guilty plea in criminal court, but the defendant does not admit to the criminal act itself. This plea can be beneficial in certain cases, especially if the defendant wishes to avoid potential civil liability that might arise from admitting guilt.
Here’s how it works under Louisiana law:
-
Criminal Court: When a defendant pleads no contest, the court treats it the same as a guilty plea in terms of sentencing. The judge can impose penalties such as fines, probation, or imprisonment, just as they would with a guilty plea.
-
Civil Liability: One of the main advantages of a no contest plea is that it usually cannot be used as evidence of liability in a subsequent civil lawsuit. For example, if someone pleads no contest to a criminal charge related to a car accident, this plea generally cannot be used against them in a civil suit for damages arising from the accident.
-
Record and Consequences: A no contest plea results in a conviction on the defendant’s criminal record, and it may have the same long-term consequences as a guilty plea, such as affecting future employment, professional licensing, or firearm rights.
-
Discretion of the Judge: The judge must accept a no contest plea, and in some cases, they may reject it if they believe it's not in the interests of justice.
It's important to discuss the implications of a no contest plea with legal counsel, as it may have specific consequences depending on the charges and the circumstances of the case.
An Alford plea is a type of guilty plea in criminal law where a defendant does not admit to the criminal act but acknowledges that the prosecution has enough evidence to likely secure a conviction. The plea allows the defendant to maintain their innocence while still accepting the legal consequences of a guilty plea. It is named after the 1970 U.S. Supreme Court case North Carolina v. Alford.
In an Alford plea:
- The defendant asserts their innocence or does not admit guilt.
- The defendant agrees to be treated as guilty for sentencing purposes.
- The court must determine that the plea is made knowingly, voluntarily, and based on a strong factual basis for guilt.
The plea is typically used when a defendant wishes to avoid the risk of a harsher sentence if convicted at trial. It allows them to accept a plea bargain while not fully admitting to the crime. Despite maintaining innocence, the defendant is convicted and punished just as if they had entered a standard guilty plea.
In Louisiana, criminal negligence is defined under Louisiana Revised Statutes (La. R.S. 14:12). It occurs when there is such a disregard of the interest of others that the conduct of the offender amounts to a gross deviation below the standard of care expected of a reasonably prudent person under similar circumstances.
Key Points:
- Gross Deviation: Criminal negligence involves a significant departure from what a reasonably careful person would do in a similar situation.
- Standard of Care: It is measured by what a reasonably prudent person would have done under the same or similar circumstances.
- Disregard for Safety: The negligence must show a disregard for the safety or welfare of others, which leads to harm or poses a significant risk of harm.
Criminal negligence can be a component in various crimes, such as negligent homicide or negligent injuring, where the negligent act results in death or bodily harm. The penalties for crimes involving criminal negligence can vary, but they often involve fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity of the offense and its consequences.