Blog/News

In the realm of criminal justice, two terms often surface when discussing clemency: pardon and commutation. While both involve acts of mercy granted to individuals convicted of crimes, they serve different purposes and have distinct legal and practical implications. This article will clarify the key differences between these two forms of clemency.

 

What Is a Pardon?

 

A pardon is an act of forgiveness issued by a government authority, typically a president at the federal level or a governor at the state level. It removes legal penalties associated with a conviction and often restores certain rights lost due to the conviction, such as the right to vote, hold public office, or own firearms.

A pardon does not expunge or erase the criminal record; the conviction remains, but the individual is forgiven for the offense. Pardons are generally granted in recognition of good behavior, remorse, or rehabilitation after the conviction. They are also sometimes used to address wrongful convictions or perceived injustices.

Key Features of a Pardon:

• Forgives the offense but does not erase the criminal record.

• Often restores civil rights lost due to the conviction.

• Requires an application or petition in most cases.

• Does not necessarily signify innocence.

What Is a Commutation?

 

A commutation is a reduction of a sentence that has already been imposed. It does not eliminate the conviction or associated penalties entirely but shortens the punishment. For instance, a commutation might reduce a life sentence to a term of years or convert a death sentence to life imprisonment.

Commutations are often granted to individuals who have demonstrated rehabilitation, served a significant portion of their sentence, or are facing extraordinary circumstances, such as a terminal illness. Unlike a pardon, a commutation does not restore civil rights or forgive the offense—it merely modifies the sentence to make it less severe.

Key Features of a Commutation:

• Reduces the severity of a sentence without nullifying the conviction.

• Does not restore civil rights.

• Often granted in cases of hardship, good behavior, or mitigating circumstances.

• Requires a petition in most cases.

Comparing Pardons and Commutations

 

Aspect	Pardon	Commutation
Purpose	Forgiveness of the crime and restoration of rights	Reduction of sentence severity
Effect on Conviction	Does not erase the conviction	Conviction remains unchanged
Restoration of Rights	Often restores civil rights	Does not restore rights
Eligibility	Typically post-conviction and post-sentence	Can be granted during imprisonment

 

Legal and Social Implications

 

Pardons and commutations reflect a government’s recognition of mercy and justice. However, they are not without controversy. Critics argue that these powers can be misused for political purposes, while proponents emphasize their role in correcting injustices and showing compassion.

Understanding the difference between these two forms of clemency is crucial for anyone navigating the legal system, advocating for criminal justice reform, or seeking relief for themselves or others. Whether through forgiveness or leniency, both pardons and commutations represent the balance between justice and mercy within the criminal justice system.

 

In the competitive legal landscape of New Orleans, where the stakes in criminal defense are high and clients expect nothing but the best representation, one name has consistently stood out for nearly a decade: Attorney Stephen Hebert. Once again, Hebert has earned the distinction of being recognized as one of the Three Best Rated criminal defense lawyers in New Orleans, marking his 8th consecutive year receiving this prestigious honor.

A Decade of Excellence

Stephen Hebert's inclusion in Three Best Rated’s list is no coincidence. This platform rigorously evaluates local businesses and professionals, ensuring only the most qualified and top-performing individuals earn a spot. Attorneys are assessed on a 50-point inspection that includes factors such as reputation, history, complaints, ratings, satisfaction, trust, cost, and general excellence.

Hebert’s continued recognition is a testament to his unwavering dedication to his clients and the legal community. With a practice that emphasizes personalized legal strategies, he has successfully defended countless individuals facing serious criminal charges, from misdemeanors to complex felonies.

A Commitment to Justice

Stephen Hebert’s philosophy revolves around a client-first approach. He understands the emotional and legal challenges that come with criminal charges, and he tirelessly advocates for his clients at every stage of the process. His thorough preparation, sharp courtroom skills, and compassionate demeanor set him apart as a leader in the field.

Clients frequently praise Hebert for his clear communication, accessibility, and ability to achieve favorable outcomes even in the most challenging cases. Fellow attorneys and judges respect him for his professionalism, integrity, and deep understanding of criminal law.

About Three Best Rated

Three Best Rated is a consumer-oriented platform dedicated to identifying and celebrating the top three businesses and professionals in various industries within a given city. Its meticulous evaluation process ensures that only the best earn the title. For Stephen Hebert, being ranked among the top three for eight consecutive years highlights not only his consistent excellence but also his enduring impact on the New Orleans community.

Looking Ahead

As Stephen Hebert celebrates this milestone, he remains committed to delivering top-tier legal representation. His dedication to defending the rights and freedoms of his clients continues to be a driving force behind his success.

For those in need of a trusted criminal defense attorney in New Orleans, Stephen Hebert’s name has become synonymous with excellence, reliability, and justice. His consistent recognition by Three Best Rated underscores his status as a pillar of the legal community and a champion for his clients.

Final Thoughts

Being recognized as one of the Three Best Rated criminal defense lawyers for the 8th consecutive year is a remarkable achievement that speaks volumes about Stephen Hebert’s expertise and dedication. As he continues to set the bar high for legal excellence in New Orleans, clients and peers alike can look forward to his continued contributions to the field of criminal defense.

 

Interacting with law enforcement can be a daunting and intimidating experience, especially if you are unaware of your rights. Whether you’re approached as a witness, a suspect, or even as a victim of a crime, one principle remains crucial: never speak to law enforcement without a lawyer present. This isn’t about being uncooperative or evasive; it’s about protecting your rights and ensuring that any statements you make cannot be misconstrued or used against you. Here’s why this advice is essential:

---

1. The Right to Remain Silent Is Your Shield

The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees your right against self-incrimination. This means you are not required to say anything that might implicate you in a crime, even unintentionally. However, simply invoking your right to remain silent isn’t always enough. A lawyer can guide you on what to say—or not say—ensuring your silence isn’t misinterpreted as guilt.

---

2. Misstatements Can Have Severe Consequences

Even innocent individuals may inadvertently say something that law enforcement can use against them. The stress of being questioned, the complexity of the law, and the pressure to "cooperate" can lead to seemingly harmless errors. A misstatement, inconsistency, or poorly worded answer can raise suspicion, even when there’s no wrongdoing.

For example, if you provide a timeline of your actions and later realize you got a detail wrong, that inconsistency might be seen as a lie, undermining your credibility.

---

3. Law Enforcement’s Goals May Not Align With Yours

While most police officers act in good faith, their primary objective is to solve crimes and gather evidence. This can sometimes lead them to view you as a potential suspect, even if you approached them voluntarily. Anything you say can be recorded, documented, and potentially used as evidence—whether or not it’s relevant or accurate.

Additionally, officers are trained in interrogation techniques designed to elicit confessions or statements. Without a lawyer to level the playing field, you may inadvertently fall into traps, even if you’re entirely innocent.

---

4. You May Not Know the Full Context

When law enforcement questions you, they may already have information you don’t. Your answers could unintentionally confirm or contradict their existing evidence. Without understanding the full scope of their investigation, you risk walking into a situation unprepared. A lawyer, however, can gather necessary information and advise you on how to proceed safely.

---

5. Your Lawyer Ensures Fair Treatment

Having a lawyer present ensures your rights are respected during any interaction with law enforcement. A lawyer can:

• Prevent inappropriate or leading questions.
• Stop questioning if it becomes coercive or violates your rights.
• Advise you on whether to answer specific questions or invoke your right to silence.
• Protect you from agreeing to anything that could harm your case or reputation.

---

How to Politely Refuse to Speak Without a Lawyer

It’s important to assert your rights respectfully and calmly. If approached by law enforcement, you can say something like:

• “I would like to speak to my lawyer before answering any questions.”
• “I am invoking my right to remain silent and request my attorney.”

This response is not an admission of guilt; it’s a clear, lawful assertion of your rights.

---

Final Thoughts

Remaining silent and requesting legal counsel is not about obstructing justice; it’s about protecting yourself from potential misunderstandings and ensuring fair treatment. By having a lawyer present, you level the playing field and safeguard your rights. Remember: it’s not about what you say—it’s how what you say can be used.

No matter how confident or innocent you feel, never assume you can navigate an interaction with law enforcement on your own. Trust your lawyer to guide you through the process and ensure your best interests are protected.

In an impressive professional milestone, criminal defense attorney Stephen Hébert has been named one of New Orleans Magazine's "Top Lawyers" in the field of criminal defense for the ninth time. This recognition not only highlights Hébert's expertise and dedication but also underscores his consistent reputation as one of the city’s leading legal advocates in criminal law.

Hébert has built a distinguished career as a criminal defense attorney, earning a reputation for his skillful defense and dedication to clients' rights. Over the years, he has successfully represented numerous clients in a variety of complex criminal cases, from misdemeanors to serious felony charges. His approach to each case is characterized by meticulous preparation, thorough investigation, and unwavering commitment to achieving the best possible outcomes for his clients. This accolade is a testament to Hébert's continued excellence in a challenging and evolving area of law.

Each year, New Orleans Magazine partners with a national research organization, often utilizing peer-reviewed surveys to compile a list of the area’s top attorneys across various fields of law. Here’s a look at how the selection process typically works:

 

1. Peer Nomination: The process starts with peer nominations, where licensed attorneys in the region nominate colleagues they believe exemplify professional excellence in their respective fields. These nominations reflect the trust and respect of fellow attorneys, a crucial component in identifying leaders within each practice area.

2. Evaluation and Research: Following the initial nominations, nominees undergo an evaluation by a research team. This involves reviewing their experience, case outcomes, client satisfaction, and adherence to professional standards. The research team considers various metrics, ensuring that each selected lawyer has made a significant impact within their field and maintains a positive reputation among peers and clients alike.

3. Final Selection: Once the evaluations are complete, the magazine publishes its final list, honoring attorneys who have demonstrated excellence in their practice areas. The list includes attorneys across multiple specialties, with criminal defense being one of the most competitive categories.

Being named to this list is a distinguished accomplishment for any attorney. However, achieving this honor for nine years highlights Hébert’s consistency and continued leadership in criminal defense. Such repeated recognition suggests a deep trust within the legal community and reinforces his reputation for outstanding advocacy and professionalism.

Beyond his legal victories, Hébert’s dedication to his clients and the broader community further sets him apart. In addition to his work in the courtroom, he has made substantial contributions to legal education and public service, striving to make a positive impact on the legal landscape in New Orleans.

Stephen Hébert's inclusion among New Orleans Magazine's Top Lawyers for the ninth year in criminal defense is a well-deserved recognition of his exceptional skills, dedication to justice, and the trust he has earned from peers and clients alike. As he continues his practice, Hébert remains a crucial asset to the New Orleans legal community, embodying the highest standards of his profession.

 

 

A "no contest" plea, also known as a "nolo contendere" plea, under Louisiana law, allows a defendant to accept conviction without admitting guilt. It has the same legal effect as a guilty plea in criminal court, but the defendant does not admit to the criminal act itself. This plea can be beneficial in certain cases, especially if the defendant wishes to avoid potential civil liability that might arise from admitting guilt.

Here’s how it works under Louisiana law:

1. Criminal Court: When a defendant pleads no contest, the court treats it the same as a guilty plea in terms of sentencing. The judge can impose penalties such as fines, probation, or imprisonment, just as they would with a guilty plea.

2. Civil Liability: One of the main advantages of a no contest plea is that it usually cannot be used as evidence of liability in a subsequent civil lawsuit. For example, if someone pleads no contest to a criminal charge related to a car accident, this plea generally cannot be used against them in a civil suit for damages arising from the accident.

3. Record and Consequences: A no contest plea results in a conviction on the defendant’s criminal record, and it may have the same long-term consequences as a guilty plea, such as affecting future employment, professional licensing, or firearm rights.

4. Discretion of the Judge: The judge must accept a no contest plea, and in some cases, they may reject it if they believe it's not in the interests of justice.

It's important to discuss the implications of a no contest plea with legal counsel, as it may have specific consequences depending on the charges and the circumstances of the case.

 

 

An Alford plea is a type of guilty plea in criminal law where a defendant does not admit to the criminal act but acknowledges that the prosecution has enough evidence to likely secure a conviction. The plea allows the defendant to maintain their innocence while still accepting the legal consequences of a guilty plea. It is named after the 1970 U.S. Supreme Court case North Carolina v. Alford.

 

In an Alford plea:

 

1. The defendant asserts their innocence or does not admit guilt.
2. The defendant agrees to be treated as guilty for sentencing purposes.
3. The court must determine that the plea is made knowingly, voluntarily, and based on a strong factual basis for guilt.

 

The plea is typically used when a defendant wishes to avoid the risk of a harsher sentence if convicted at trial. It allows them to accept a plea bargain while not fully admitting to the crime. Despite maintaining innocence, the defendant is convicted and punished just as if they had entered a standard guilty plea.

 

In Louisiana, criminal negligence is defined under Louisiana Revised Statutes (La. R.S. 14:12). It occurs when there is such a disregard of the interest of others that the conduct of the offender amounts to a gross deviation below the standard of care expected of a reasonably prudent person under similar circumstances.

 

Key Points:

• Gross Deviation: Criminal negligence involves a significant departure from what a reasonably careful person would do in a similar situation.
• Standard of Care: It is measured by what a reasonably prudent person would have done under the same or similar circumstances.
• Disregard for Safety: The negligence must show a disregard for the safety or welfare of others, which leads to harm or poses a significant risk of harm.

 

Criminal negligence can be a component in various crimes, such as negligent homicide or negligent injuring, where the negligent act results in death or bodily harm. The penalties for crimes involving criminal negligence can vary, but they often involve fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity of the offense and its consequences.

 

 

Prosecutorial immunity, also known as absolute immunity, is a legal doctrine that protects prosecutors from being held personally liable for their actions in the course of performing their duties. This immunity is intended to ensure that prosecutors can carry out their responsibilities effectively without fear of being sued for actions taken as part of their official duties.

 

Prosecutorial immunity typically applies to actions such as initiating prosecutions, presenting evidence in court, making arguments, and exercising discretion in deciding how to handle a case. This immunity is based on the principle that prosecutors need to have the freedom to make decisions in the pursuit of justice without the threat of lawsuits hindering their work.

 

It's important to note that prosecutorial immunity is not unlimited. Prosecutors can still be held accountable for actions that are outside the scope of their official duties, such as engaging in illegal conduct or knowingly presenting false evidence in court.

 

Prosecutorial immunity is a complex legal concept that varies by jurisdiction, and the specific scope and limitations of immunity may differ based on the laws and court rulings in a particular jurisdiction.

 

Expungement in Louisiana criminal law refers to the process of sealing or erasing a person's criminal record from public view. This legal procedure allows individuals to have their criminal records cleared, meaning that the records are not accessible to the general public, although certain law enforcement agencies and other specified entities may still access them.

Key Points about Expungement in Louisiana:

1. Eligibility:

   • Misdemeanors: Generally, individuals can seek expungement for misdemeanor convictions if it has been at least five years since the completion of their sentence, including probation or parole, and they have not been convicted of any other crimes during that period.
   • Felonies: Felony convictions are more challenging to expunge. Typically, expungement is available only for non-violent felony offenses. It must have been at least ten years since the completion of the sentence, and the individual must not have been convicted of any other crimes during that period.
   • Arrests without Convictions: If a person was arrested but not convicted, or if the charges were dismissed or resulted in acquittal, they might be eligible for expungement.

2. Ineligibility:

   • Certain crimes, such as violent offenses, sex crimes, and crimes involving minors, are generally not eligible for expungement.
   • Multiple convictions can complicate the eligibility for expungement.

3. Procedure:

   • Filing a Petition: The individual must file a petition for expungement in the court where the conviction or arrest occurred.
   • Hearing: A hearing may be scheduled where the court will review the petition and determine if the expungement is warranted.
   • Costs: There are usually fees associated with filing for expungement, which can be substantial.

4. Effects:

   • Once an expungement is granted, the record is sealed, and the individual can legally state that they have not been arrested or convicted for the expunged offense.
   • However, the record is not destroyed and can be accessed by certain entities, such as law enforcement agencies, in specific circumstances.

5. Limitations:

   • Expungement does not restore firearm rights automatically.
   • Certain professional licensing boards and employers, especially in sensitive fields, may still have access to expunged records.

Legal Context:

Louisiana's expungement laws are outlined in the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure. The specific requirements and procedures can vary, and legal counsel is often recommended to navigate the complexities of the process.  Overall, expungement provides a means for individuals to move past their criminal records, potentially improving their employment prospects and social standing by ensuring that past offenses do not continually impede their future opportunities.

 

The right to compulsory process in the context of a criminal trial is a fundamental principle of the legal system, particularly in common law jurisdictions like the United States. It essentially grants the defendant the right to compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of evidence that may be favorable to their case. This right is enshrined in the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states that the accused shall enjoy the right "to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor." In practice, this means that if a defendant believes that certain witnesses or evidence could help exonerate them or weaken the prosecution's case, they have the right to request the court to compel those witnesses to testify or produce that evidence. The court must then issue subpoenas or orders to ensure that those witnesses appear in court and provide their testimony, or that the evidence is produced for examination. The right to compulsory process is crucial for ensuring a fair trial and protecting the defendant's rights to present a defense. Without this right, defendants could be unfairly deprived of evidence that could potentially prove their innocence or cast doubt on the prosecution's case.